(via pescadofresco)
(via pescadofresco)
jdeko reblogged this from alledherlu-q-pereon and added: i would just want to make the female character flat chested and in the rare occasion it matters have her be biologically...
Also I like these types of female characters *as* idealised female power fantasies. It’s not a double standard, op is...
tsunderewatermelon liked this
emberwritesinsight liked this
thequirkygirlnextdoor liked this
catcatb0y said:
-statement is about you not separating yourself from your character, so clearly it does have SOME impact on reality or you wouldn’t “play as girls because you don’t want to look like a macho beefcake.”
catcatb0y said:
@davidrazi even then, your whole argument is that, yes, there is sexism on both sides (although it can be argued, again, that having more muscle is typically associated with strength).
The armor is supposed to make you look nice! That doesn’t mean you’re a super macho beefcake beneath it. It’s not even that bad you have issues.
^ does that sound like a good fucking argument to you? Cause that’s your statement genderbended. Even then, your whole “it affects guys, too”-
catcatb0y said:
It makes you look like an incel
catcatb0y said:
Yes, absolutely fictitious worlds are not real, nor do they have the direct power to influence real life. However, stereotypes and treatments of characters- specifically the huge trend in sexualizing female characters (for male appeal) does have an effect over time. Many of these fantasy enjoyers have a tendency to treat girls in real life like the female characters they see on screen- i.e. as one-dimensional, sexualized props. Saying “it’s not real” means Jack shit and-
catcatb0y said:
@davidrazi yeah it’s not real it’s drawn by (cishet) guys who want to reduce women to ass and tiddies that the whole fucking problem
catcatb0y reblogged this from davidrazi and added: Ultimately the difference is the Ultra macho beefcake look is usually a (male) projection fantasy, whereas the ‘sexy,...
catcatb0y liked this
defcia posted this